Free High-Resolution Wallpapers
Section:
Wallpaper Details: Upcoming Fog Highway
Your Comments
Posted By: RhiNo0
Thu August 28th, 2008 at 08:22:38 AM CDT
The idea for this photo was so good, but the real conditions shouldn't made the better way for it. As said up, more fog would be better to add some depth. But that's the way.
Posted By: Giovanni Di Gregorio
Thu August 28th, 2008 at 11:01:49 AM CDT
I generally like the author's work, but this is not a good photo.
Posted By: Bingoyoyo
Thu August 28th, 2008 at 02:57:03 PM CDT
what was your iso? 1600+ I think this shot is way to grainy. I think it would be better with an iso of 100 and a very long exposer to really make this shot a great one.
Posted By: Chris Gin
Thu August 28th, 2008 at 03:07:44 PM CDT
As others have said, nice idea and I like the composition, but I don't think the light was right for this shot. Good excuse to go back and try and again though!
Posted By: Sage
Thu August 28th, 2008 at 03:23:48 PM CDT
Not sure what happened here. Others don't like the lighting, which is understandable, however, I'm not even sure I like the composition either. That fence along the trees kind of ruins the effect. It's pretty grainy, and nothing jumps out as the point of focus. Might try finding something else to shoot.
Posted By: deuceswild09
Thu August 28th, 2008 at 08:26:29 PM CDT
Excellent concept, but poor execution. The excessive noise and lack of a point of interest really ruins the effect. If you could make it a little less noisy it would be usable, but as it is now it is just another picture. There's nothing really exciting about it.
Posted By: fattire
Sat September 13th, 2008 at 11:16:21 PM CDT
This location feels like the pathway to a beach in Big Sur near Carmel, California. Exactly like it. I know i'm stretching, but can you indulge the location?
Posted By: SkyHigh
Tue September 16th, 2008 at 11:38:49 AM CDT
Hi all,
Thanks all for the feedback. Actually this shot is taken on old fashioned negative film, iso 160, scanned the negative with a Nikon Coolscan IV and worked around it a bit in PS. The print has more saturation and less grain than the scan. Maybe if I worked on it some more in Photoshop I could improve it.
To Fattire - amazing you say this because it is indeed the exact location.
SkyHigh
Thanks all for the feedback. Actually this shot is taken on old fashioned negative film, iso 160, scanned the negative with a Nikon Coolscan IV and worked around it a bit in PS. The print has more saturation and less grain than the scan. Maybe if I worked on it some more in Photoshop I could improve it.
To Fattire - amazing you say this because it is indeed the exact location.
SkyHigh
Posted By: Bojan Marsetich
Tue January 6th, 2009 at 09:30:38 AM CDT
not creepy - but comfortable - That's what I feel, anyway Great! Where?
Post A Comment
Use the form below to post a comment about this wallpaper. Please keep your comments on topic. Inappropriate or malicious comments may be removed or edited at the discretion of the webmaster.
Each comment can be rated by other InterfaceLIFT members and each user receives an overall score based on the sum of the ratings of all their individual comments. Users that have earned extremely negative cumulative scores may be barred from posting comments or their postings may require approval before appearing on the site.
Copyright 2000-2009 L-bow Grease, LLC.
Either way the shot was a good idea. Keep it up...